MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD
CPC Review O XLVII, Civil Procedure Code Order XLVII of Civil 1 and S Capital Development Authority Ordinance (XXII of 1960), Section 4 Review Request The High Court's Maintenance Division Bench has sought to review its decision Whether or not the record was forged as a question, was one of the facts that could not be recorded without proof. At the time of the verdict, it was not brought to the Division Bench that the second inquiry was made by the Additional Director Security who kept the matter. Before the chairman in charge can officially approve the inquiry report, Syed's report should be taken as a report of the Capital Development Authority under the Capital Development Authority Ordinance, 1960 as referred to by the Division Bench at the time of the intra-court settlement. This aspect was not considered before. Appeal, application for review and practice of appeal on its merits, approved
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
