NOMAN ANSARI versus MUKHTAR BEGUM
Section 17 of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963, applied for the eviction of privately owned Macmorlan property, against the tenant, against the tenant only because of his personal necessity. ? The man owned more than one shop in Landlord's possession but gave a statement on the oath, which was in accordance with the application for eviction. Landlady was not shaken in her cross-examination or refused to be rejected In order to establish her desperate need for landowners, it was necessary to make a decision about adaptation to which particular property. It is desirable by its owner and the tenant was not evicted for the particular purpose that successfully established the landlord's need for personal status. I intervened
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Kalaswala lawyer
