ABDUL HAMEED versus BOO ALI SHAH ZAIDI
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 (2) (vii) and 21 of the landlord's personal need applied to the rent controller to evict the tenant based on the sole requirement of his son to control the rent. And ordered the tenant to vacate the cover. The witnesses of the tenant, with evidence in their affidavits, said that the landlord intended to rent the property, after which he had taken possession of the lease and had been discharged, The tenant also provided a video recording of a conversation between the parties and the landlord. Impact landlord's previous conduct also proved that he had accepted other tenants on new terms, and the terms effect landlord had, in the circumstances, unable to prove his good need, the order of the rent controller Was isolated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Moro lawyer