Sections 55, 55 55, as 62 and A 76A [represented by public representation (Amendment Ordinance (XVIII of 1997)]] allegations of electoral application based on the selection of returning candidates The challenged candidates were defeated in their election petitions, have already been examined and scanned against various competent forums, and the applicants in their election petitions against the returning candidates in any way. New incompetence was not expressed or provoked because of the attacks on election petitions that failed in the past. If there were provocations, there could be any utility. Under Section 76A of the Representation People Act 1976, the autonomous jurisdiction should have been considered that the election petitions had failed miserably to fulfill the provisions of Section 55 of the Public Representation Act 1976 They must compare the evidence under the testimony and the election applicants did not even bother to file an affidavit of such W ness circumstantial circumstances. ....... Election. petition .... ss ............................................ ....................
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
