Find a Lawyer

INAM & COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., GUJRAT versus PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD FOR LIQUIDATION, LAHORE

Articles 22 and 7 (v) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), OIX, R9, for the presence and defense of the Council of Councilors and Clients, Punjab Unlawful Cooperative Societies (Conflict) Act, 1993 Was a request for. Co-operative judge dismissed ex parte application for dismissal of such former cross-order was dismissed for illegal prosecution when an appeal for defense hearing was heard about his absence. The reasonable appellant provided the proper explanation. The appellant had requested his lawyer for being involved in an important meeting and had also sent an air ticket to appear in court on the due date, but this lawyer had to go on that date for Umrah and he Requested another senior lawyer. Appoint and adjourn in his affidavit, the Senior Counsel said that such a request was acknowledged and the date was also noted in the diary, but on that day, the absence of the court from his office Inadvertently escalated to slip: Appellant was negligent in pursuing the case and, in fact, had taken reasonable steps to ensure his lawyer's presence in the court, the Supreme Court on the one hand dismissing the former party order. Whereby the application for rejection of the pre-order is dismissed and the said application shall be allowed. The remand was received by the cooperative judge for further investigation and furthering the matter. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer