Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus SURESHCHAND MITTAL


The actual assessment of reference penalty income was completed on assessment annual income for the year 1983 85 and for the year 85 of 1984, declaring the loss in 1986 for 87 stated that due to the unknown investment approved under section 132 of the Assisi Earned income will be traced to the assessed income business premises. () Assessing officer filing revised returns, offering additional income for the four assessment years, accepting additional income presented as unidentified income and proceeding with penalty for four years. Initial Findings of Penalties on the Tribunal Referring to the Hidden Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 256 (2) and 271 (1) (C) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 256 (2) and 271 (1) (C) Born for

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Dhatmal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.