Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT

The Family Court High Court resolved the marriage of the Khulla suit on the basis of section 8 constitution of the Muslim Family Ordinance 1961 (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 constitutional petition to dissolve the marriage by the wife on the basis of the marriage. Excluded under it. After the constitutional jurisdiction overruled the evidence, it was concluded that the Family Court completely ignored the evidence which clearly proved that the parties could not live within the limits set by God and the trial. The court decides, the marriage was dissolved to protect the parties from violating God's ordinance. The husband's contention that the High Court is not capable of exercising its constitutional jurisdiction is not a Family Court. Change its results recorded by the although it was concluded after a review of the evidence that the trial The wife had clearly stated before the High Court that the writ was false. That she had previously hated her husband and wife in the previous PK, so before the Supreme Court case, this position was not capable of interfering with the Supreme Court decision which was filed by the husband. Was the victim of a defect. immigration advocates phone number from Digri lawyer