MUHAMMAD AMIR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
West Pakistan Government Land and Buildings (Recovery) Ordinance 1966 Section 10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Property-Ownership Controversy No Objection to Response, Impact Limitation Action Implemented three times in presence. There was no objection to the proceedings of the respondents' representatives, but the respondents agreed to the accuracy of such proceedings and had submitted their signatures under the report and were legally included in the daily revenue record. Which clearly proved the applicant's claim. The trust presented by the applicants on the ground in the dispute affected the trust, and as a result, the applicant was the owner of the disputed property, the lower appellate court failed to appreciate the evidence on record in its true context. As such, his detention was found to be illegal in substance and his non-refundable review was granted and in the circumstances the lower appellate court order was set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Nooriabad lawyer
