TAUS KHAN versus STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 365A & 365 definition of evidence neither the complainant nor his wife stated that the accused had ever demanded ransom for the return of his child. Was not listed under section 161, CR PC. , Nor was it presented to the trial court for the defendants to demand payment of the ransom money or to pay them, saying that the complainant's wife had arranged for the money by an unknown person over the telephone. Cannot be considered. The evidence against the accused cannot be used as a pernicious piece of evidence against him because in his statement under Section 2 342 the CRPC failed to prove the prosecution. The demand or payment of ransom money for the release of the abductor against the accused under section 365A, PPC, was changed to section 365, PPC and his death sentence was limited to seven years.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Noshki lawyer
