TEHSIL MUNICIPAL OFFICER, TMA KAHUTA versus GUL FRAZ KHAN
Article 4 ((()) Work Charges) Employees Employees Employing Charges Employees claim that employees are regular employees on the basis of employment charges (contracts), irrespective of the length of time. Not being employed as a regular employee, respondent was initially employed by the health department on the basis of work charge, but after the departure of this department, all its assets, liabilities and offices were transferred to the municipal administration. Successful (applicant) defendant's services were transferred to the municipal administration, which paid him regularly. The High Court declared the defendant to be a regular employee of the Municipal Administration (applicant) for 13 years because of his continued service, as the municipal administration failed to show that his job was a contract. Based on the regular intervals for three months and at a regular interval for three months at a time, the documents kept on record by the respondents clearly indicated that with the Municipal Administration The job is also based on work compensation and he is paid for the work that he answers. Just had the health or well. The municipal administration remained on the basis of work charge and was never appointed as a regular employee and on the basis of the charge of the work, its employment, whatever its length, did not give it a regular employee status. Yes, the High Court erred in retaining the defendant as a regular employee. Due to the municipal administration's failure to show that its appointment
