Find a Lawyer

SAIF ULLAH KHAN versus STATE

The testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 evidence has not been examined to substantiate the statements of any independent witness prosecution witness who was the father's son, which stated that the prosecution witnesses were last seen in the company of the accused. They were seen to be contradictory and were widely exposed. Improvements to his previous statements all said that the improvements, along with the contradictions, suggested that the incident did not happen under the incident as prosecutors alleged that evidence of pistol recovery was allegedly used and There was no vacancy and after that the case was not forwarded as there was no report. In connection with this the forensic science laboratory was brought on record, the trial court failed to link the accused to the trial court's crime commission, and conviction and sentencing of the accused was not sustainable, the accused. He was acquitted. property advocate from Patoki lawyer