TARIQ MAHMOOD CHAUDHRY KAMBOH versus NAJAM-UZT-DIN
Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R11 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the CPC Plaintiff V VII was rejected by the Appeal's appeal which sought against the decision of the HC passed in the amendment. In which the High Court upheld the decision of the Civil Court. Refusing to reject the applicant's petition, the applicants filed an application under O. VII, R11, CPC, claiming that the case filed against them should be dismissed because the case was dismissed. The hearing was adjourned when the trial court dismissed the petitioner's review and review. The trial court's decision, which was rejected by the High Court against the trial court's decision, had already prepared to resolve the issue whether the case was within time and also to find the question related to the limitation in this case law. And there was a mixed question of fact and said that the matter could only be. The evidence was resolved after recording the touching dispute, neither the trial court nor the High Court had made any mistake, while upon reaching such a court, the civil court had rejected it well. The petitioner's leave was dismissed for appeal while the applicant also properly maintained the petition filed under OII, R 11, CPC and the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Feroz Walla lawyer