Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD NAEEM versus ATTA RABANI

Defendants of Civil Procedure Code Order XVII XVII O XVII, Rr 2 and 3 Proof of Appeal The defendant obtained numerous motions to present his evidence on the non-appearance of evidence to the effect and the defendants were given a final opportunity to present evidence. That two witnesses were present on the date of the plaintiff but their evidence could not be recorded because of the strike by the lawyers, therefore, because of circumstances beyond the control of the parties, it was required when the plaintiff in the adjournment case. Failed to appear in court and in court. The provisions of CPC XOII, R3, closed their evidence. Accreditation The trial court may dismiss the case for non-proceeding under the provisions of O XVII, R 2, read with CPC IX, R 8, or make another such order that was deemed appropriate. ? However, closing the evidence under R 3, O XVII, the CPC did not legally affirm the trial court's order that the High Court had set aside the Circle by closing the evidence of the plaintiff. Items jobs for fresh advocates from Kabir Wala lawyer