Find a Lawyer

JAAFAR versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/34 testimony was the light of day in the case and witnesses filed a permanent FIR against the accused and the accused went to the complaining party to make false allegations of the two witnesses. There was no possibility of deliberation. There were quite a few natural witnesses as they both lived in the same house with their deceased mother and the incident happened just outside their house, saying the witnesses were accused of falsely accusing them of murder. There was no personal prejudice or malice. Gave honest and straightforward statements that affected his confidence. The other spectacular witness was also a witness to nature as well as living in the complainant's neighborhood and had also acquired some land on lease which he said had nothing to do with it. The party, which had no clear reason to falsely impeach the accused Moti, was compiled by the prosecution and the community of interest and encouragement between the two suspects was not suspected as the two agreed to marry. Caused tension in the relationship with the complaining party and subsequently received a gun from the visiting persons. In the immediate aftermath of the incident, after recovering from the crime, Oscar went on to provide assistance to the account, the medical evidence produced by the prosecution also fully supported the Ocular Account because the same incident, the use of weapons, Witnesses' statements about the timing of the meetings have been confirmed. Due to the injuries and seizures that caused these injuries, the prosecution accused ask a advocate free from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer