TALAT MAHMOOD versus ISMAT EHTISHATIIUL HAQ
Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Temporary Integration and Interaction Orders 0 XXXIX, R 2 (3) Violation or violation of the terms of the Order from which the court did not approve the original order of temporary injunction under O XXXXX Was. R1, CPC eligibility A number of proceedings were pending between the parties in different courts, and under the High Court's order, the district and session judge were instructed to avoid pending civil litigation between the parties. Submit to a court And according to such order of the High Court, the Sessions Judge directed the case to be transferred to the Civil Judge SS Court Court because at the time of approval of such order, the original Judge passed without any alternative to the Civil Judge. Neither the orders to direct the decision of the High Court case nor the transfer order of the District Judge were challenged, but the petitioner took part in the proceedings and on any occasion of the transfer court. There was no objection to the scope's merits so that action could not be taken nor any issue raised on the matter. It was referred to in the memorandum of appeal before the High Court. The dispute is that the action taken by the transfer court and it was stated that the court was illegal and without jurisdiction because the original order of the status was passed by another court, there was no sense in the circumstances. The transfer court had jurisdiction to decide the application under FXX, R 2 (3), CPC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Deh Pathaan lawyer