ABDUL KHALIQ versus RASHID AHMAD
Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 The respondent had purchased the entire holdings of the petitioner Petitioner, in connection with the sale transaction, acceptance of the whole consideration, transfer of possession and change of sale was approved, which Some part of the earth was abandoned. Due to the Maulvi error, the Change Sheet respondents filed a correction for the error, it was discovered that the petitioner's argument was that no declaration in respect of the title could be made on the basis of the art contract for sale to the trial court. , Decided the matter in favor of the applicant. But the order and judgment in favor of the respondents were overturned, the mutation on the accuracy was formally approved by the Additional District Judge as there was nothing to be done and the respondents were not allowed to rectify the error. to became fully owner of the declaration form. After the discovery, the retention and appellant had rt made exactly the same decision
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Hasilpur lawyer
