ABDUL RAZZAK TABBA versus JETPUR MEMON RELIEF SOCIETY
CPC parties filed a civil procedure code Order I suit OI, R 10 & O VI, R 17 specific relief act (I of 1877), sections 42 and 55 for compulsory injunction and declaration by plaintiff The City Metropolitan Corporation and the City Building Control Authority, as the plaintiffs, were opposed to the claim that the dispute between the plaintiffs and the private individuals, neither the MetroPolitan Corporation nor the Building Control Authority, was opposed. Needed the proper party to enforce because the plaintiff had challenged this construction by the plaintiff. On the plot in dispute, it also sought a mandatory injunction to eliminate illegal and unauthorized buildings from demolition, unless before the City Metropolitan Corporation and the Building Control Authority Court. However, the court could not find any effective relief, so permission would be granted. Plaintiff's request and Tender O VI were also requested, R 17, accordingly ACPC for amending the Claimant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kotla Jam lawyer