SULTAN MUBARIZ versus GUL MUHAMMAD
The Conan e-Martyrdom Order 1984 Article 100 considers the accuracy of a document executed by Saeed fifty years ago in connection with the property, although it was processed almost eight years ago, but it offers no satisfactory explanation. Without it was never implemented, no doubts could be raised about document preparation that was implemented thirty years ago or more, but they said the idea was arbitrary. And it was not necessary that even if the documents were presented to the thirty-year-old arid in proper custody, the court would have found his authenticity. The court was not obliged to present it. In such cases, when the evidence was not available in the document's evidence or where the evidence was presented in the document's proof, it could refuse to apply the assumption, but it was denied when the court did not extend the idea. Where he or she has reason to believe that the document was a fake or where serious doubt is associated with it may undermine the impact of speculation on the circumstances by which it has a tendency to raise doubts about the authenticity of the document. Is
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Ubaro lawyer