Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASUL versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

Sections 12, 42 and 54 of the Special Relief Act 1877, the Transfer Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 53A & 54 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), the OXXII, the RA Suit Declaration and the Appeal for Permanent Order Retention The terminating plaintiffs / plaintiffs / plaintiffs / appellant's legal representatives, through oral sales for their consideration, claimed that the full cost of the sale was paid to the vendor that resulted in the role of the plaintiff. / Was given to the appellant in his possession. When it was alleged that the vendor began claiming ownership rights over the land, it filed a declaration as an alternative to the ownership through the said property, but said the trial court The case was dismissed by the appellate court. Due to the disputed occupation, the sale of the property along with the land in dispute, but the appellate court found that under section 44 of, the Transfer of Property Act, 188282. , The title did not pass on to the plaintiff / appellant's decision, the appellant approved by the appellate court regularly challenged the second appeal before the plaintiff / appellant of the High Court, who was the landlord in the dispute. The cause died but there were no legal representatives. After being brought on record within the stipulated time, the appeal was settled and the High Court dismissed the appeal and dealt with it on the ground that the contract was a mere case of performance. Was able, but the statement filed by the claimant / appellant was banned. Writing has not been curtailed in favor of the claimant / appellant famous lower court advocate from Bannu lawyer