Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CONSUMER BRANDS LTD.


Reference Depreciation Extra Shift Allowance Extra Shift Allowance Whether allowed to operate machinery based on number of days ???? Question of law Appeal to reference of Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 32 and 256 Similar question to Tribunal Pending in front of the bench. The Tribunal justified the Assessing Officer to wait and follow the decision of the Special Bench. No question of law arises in the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 256, Reference Income Business Income Excise Duty liability excise duty High Court orders special leave petition pending before the Supreme Court Tribunal. Against this time it was justified that section 41 was not applicable, no question was raised regarding the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, section 41 (l) and 256 law.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Ranipur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.