Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 (XLV of 18/60), defining section 161 evidence that the complainant, who was an aggravated person, did not identify the accused in court and a public prosecutor Also did not attempt to identify the accused. In cross-examination, the complainant had clearly stated in the affidavit that the person who took the bribe from him was not present in the court who did not support the trial case, the accused through the trial. Was sentenced and sentenced, the benefit of the doubt extended to the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
