ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE-GENERAL versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-II, KHAIRPUR
According to the Section 540 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 State Counsel sought to police the witnesses, deliberately withheld the names of witnesses who were summoned for illicit purposes, according to the Complainant The statements in favor were not recorded. In the testimony of the accused, who was bound to cause irreparable harm to the prosecutor, the witnesses of the prosecution who had already been examined by the trial court mentioned the names of the persons who had sought the complainant, He denied the trial court's contention order, saying that the witnesses were kept separate in the circumstances and the trial court was directed to forcibly attend their proceedings and seek their damages. Test under which a revision request is allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
