SHUKAR MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN
Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Section 497 (5) Explosives Act (XI of 1908), Section 3 Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324 Bail, explosion cancellation was not observed and recorded I was not told who did the explosion, no matter what, the accused was blamed and charged with attacking and detonating an explosive device against the suspect. Based on a single statement of the suspect, the window was opened in front of the suspect with the help of a torchlight when he was armed while conducting further investigations with deadly weapons in front of the house. Needed that was possible only after the investigation was completed, the challan was ready to appear in court, the accused's pre-arrest bail was not canceled on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Daur lawyer
