Find a Lawyer

KHURSHID ANWAR, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR EDUCATION (RETD.) versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Art, 185 (3) Civil Service Anti-Diet Promotion and Back-Benefits Intelligence Record shows that the applicant was not treated by a government employee within a time when the applicant was awarded Pay Scale 17. He was taking salaries less than 10 1971, but he never objected until 1980 when he represented the authorities regularly which was considered and rejected by the petitioner till 1986. He never objected to the decision when he made another representation and whose representation was also considered and for which the petitioner Was filed. The third time was allegedly represented in 1994 and a constitutional petition was filed before the High Court in 1995 and the petitioner's lawyer prayed that a final order on the applicant's representation be approved, before the authorities. Pending, after withdrawing the constitutional request from the appropriate forum with the permission to dispose of it, it can be claimed against the applicant that he was trying to bring within a timely claim that the applicant was reasonable. He is negligent in pursuing his purpose on the steps; leave to appeal against the High Court order. The request was rejected in circumstances. criminal advocate from Parachinar lawyer