ABDUL AZIZ versus MUHAMMAD LAL
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Sentencing Laws (Enforcement) Act 1974 Section 5/15 Sentencing Code (XLV of 1860), Section 307/34 Shariah Court accepting the appeal of the accused sentenced by the trial court and remanded their cases What. After recording evidence of two prosecution witnesses who were not examined by the prosecution, the decision was taken to re-establish that the prosecution was not obliged to present to each and every witness was cited in the challan calendar. On the points of recovery and motions presented by the prosecution's other witnesses, on such points it was not necessary for the prosecution to examine the two aforesaid witnesses by the prosecution, and consequently the law passed by the court. The pending remand order was set aside and the case was re-appealed to the Shariah court. Was remanded to proceed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Bannu lawyer
