HAZOOR BAKHSH versus STATE
Definition of Pakistan Panel Code Section 302 evidence contradicts the version presented in the FIR of the version presented by the two witnesses and the version of the incident referred to by the other two witnesses is section 160, CRPC. Contradicts their statements given under. Since the statement of events described by the first two eye witnesses was completely destructive, their testimony failed to induce the eyewitness testimony individually as well as collectively. The conviction on the capital could not be safely maintained, the prosecution had no motive or immediate motive. Confirms already disturbing ocular evidence against the accused No crime was recovered from the scene of the incident, allegedly the gun recovered from the accused was not linked to the crime Medical evidence also failed to provide sufficient support to the ocular evidence. had lived. Bad in the situation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Sambrial lawyer