GHULAM MEHMOOD versus HUKAM KHAN
Sections 17 (2) (iv) and 17 (4) (a) (i) of the Cantonment Rental Act, 1963, fail to specify the personal need of the landlord in personal application to the landlord. Need for Reconstruction Son Landlord mentioned in his petition a personal need to evict the tenant The Impact The landlord sought to preserve a comprehensive and broad scope so that his At the time of recording any evidence needed at the time of recording the evidence, the landlord stated that the premises for the construction of the house for his son God needed monetization was not disclosed in any application like that, not for the proposed construction, the landlord has given a site plan prepared or approved by the relevant authority. No such authorization was obtained from any of the authorities, in order to prove the fact of necessity the landlord failed to establish a personal requirement to the extent of default in monthly payment under default.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Shujabad lawyer