PARVEEN NAZIR versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER/DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR (RP), LAHORE
Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 S 10 The permanent transfer of property was transferred through a property auction in dispute and 11 years after the issuance of a permanent transfer in favor of the transfer, receiving less than the transfer amount to the Department. He was charged, demanding the transfer of the balance auction price, he issued notice and said on the failure to transfer the money within the specified period and the transfer of money, the permanent transfer agreement, will be issued once the property. The transfer and permanent transfer process was issued long before the removal rules, the property The transfer case could not be reopened, and the transfer was left only with the department demanding payment of the balance of cost. In case of non-compliance, the property cannot be restored. Transfer was refused, transfer notice was refused and the department could not prove receipt of such notice through transfer. And the restoration of the property was contrary to the law's requirement and the department's duty to treat the illegally moving property as a resold property was not available to transfer property to anyone else, in dispute.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Machh lawyer