Find a Lawyer

BARKAT ALI versus STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 302 (b) Valuation of evidence The eyewitnesses who were close to the victim and witnesses of the incident were not seen in the incident which was an unexpected incident and various persons were being suspected in this regard. That is a major contradiction in the medical. In addition to the events that took place overnight after the incident, the claim and the instant testimony claimed that there was no one on record to support the witnesses' account of the incident, not free of serious doubts. Free rhythm was not available. The prosecution did not prove that even after more than a month, the recovery of blood stains from the accused's example is not credible, which otherwise violated the provisions of section 103, CRP witnesses The trust failed to encourage medical evidence, lost all its support or relevance, and the accused was acquitted. advocate for immigration from Dir lawyer