Find a Lawyer

ZIA SHAHID versus RAFIQ AHMED

Senate (Election) Act 1975 Section 34 Election Petition Selection of Senate Specific Seat for Professionals The respondent / retired candidate on the terms and conditions of discrimination was chosen on such a seat on the record of justification. Nothing was available on the basis that it can be legitimately found that the respondent was the master of the discrimination in the law profession; the respondent could hardly boast of any practical experience of law practice at a higher level The range can be described as someone who was among the top people. His profession, which according to him was an important component for any person claiming discrimination, shows that after 1972, the 73 law profession abandoned defendant's basic calling and prediction and, thus, Failure to present his case in large numbers in front of the courts, earning a substantial income from the profession and holding a sincere and serious devotion to the profession, the respondents were not discriminatory in the field of law and such as scholars, professionals and The specific seat for the technocrats could not be elected to the Senate, the selection of the defendants on such a seat was invalid and should be rejected. Was triggered. Under the circumstances advocates from Silanwala lawyer