ZAHEER HUSSAIN SHAH versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Completion of the Constitution Request Inquiry Report, etc. Excise and taxation staff were given the authority to arrest and investigate this crime under narcotic laws and they charged more than two persons. A case was filed reflecting the recovery of marijuana. The persons, who were found to be false and subordinate to the Associate Excise and Taxation staff during the preliminary detailed investigation of the two magistrates, along with the preliminary inquiry based on the complaint filed with the Chief Minister, were noted. And apparently there was no opportunity to allow witnesses to conduct multiple investigations that were allowed only in regular departmental investigations or court cases, no, final orders were still approved or action was taken against the applicants. And in such a preliminary stage the proposed action was taken against them. There may be amounts of showcase notices that do not provide any valid and legal basis for them. Applicants were not allowed to intervene in the executive proceedings if their interest in the final analysis was a negative and appropriate treatment of the applicants against the final action. Nevertheless, the constitutional application in the offer and in the final was dismissed under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Dijkot lawyer