JAHANGIR versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/307/148 & 149 The prosecution's case on the basis of the value of the evidence is based on ocular evidence after supporting medical evidence, the complainant who was injured in the incident, his presence on the occasion beyond any doubt. There is a dispute between the complainant and the accused parties in the criminal proceedings. The complaining party had substituted the accused instead of the original accused, which cannot be accepted because in such cases, the replacement of the accused was a rare occurrence, Otherwise, the injured complainant's statement was promptly recorded, thereby devising a plan Was not available at that time. The alternate ocular accounts and medical evidence of the original suspect were reconciled by the innocent enemies and no clear contradiction could be found by which such testimony could be denied, the two accused, who were involved in the case. And they were responsible for that, they were rightly punished. The co-accused were found innocent by repeatedly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Kot Addu lawyer