Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SAFDAR SHAH versus STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Definition of Evidence Three of the prosecution witnesses who were presented to prove that the victim had left the accused's company were closely related to the victim. The last seen evidence on the day of the incident was given by the person who could not describe how he knew the suspect by name and how he could identify the victim, the last seen evidence especially at that time. Could not be accepted when it was said that the statement of the witness was. The delay was recorded by the police, which was incomplete, inadequate, and unreliable despite the delay. In the case, the confession was a joint confession which was invalid in the eyes of the law and could not be considered as legally admissible evidence. Failed to bring crime from home, acquitted of charges [evidence admitted]

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.