AKBAR ALI KHAN versus MUKAMIL SHAH
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) Contempt of Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 The accused was charged with the cancellation of the bail and was told in the FIR that he was an empty-handed participant on the occasion. The direct motive of the incident would have been, before, it was alleged that the accused did not need any order to avenge his infamy, so he allegedly took Lalakara's confession from the accused. Came under scrutiny, and has been charged with further investigation. The bail was not stated to misuse the exception that the lower court's request for the cancellation of the accused's permission was dismissed in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer
