MIANGUL SHAHZADA JAHANZEB versus DEPUTY LAND COMMISSIONER, SWAT AT MINGORA
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No 115 Paras 11, 13 and 26 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application for Maintenance of Land and the Allotment of Specific Land to Tenants (Defendants) under the provisions of the Restoration Lane Reform Regulation 1972. Their choice to keep, apart from the selection, was allotted to the remaining respondents; after that, the second choice was made and then the new choice was made and the land in question would be justified while maintaining such. There was no substance to the challenge posed in the allotment for the respondents of the challenge. Not only the delay but also the fact that the area covered by the applicants at the crucial time was included in the declaration form filed by them and subsequently excluded from the election and to be retained. After being found beyond the allowable premises, it was secured and, thereafter, the same as is specifically assigned to the Government under Section 13, Land Reform Regulation, 1972 and art allotment to any legal violation or legal jurisdiction. And was approved by the competent authority under the Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 Scope and Framework Was protected from challenge to constitutional jurisdiction under Section 26, Land Reform Regulation, 1972. Were allowed to surrender additional land on the basis of their first choice, they will not be allowed to relinquish their previous selection. Non-amended revised selection leads to square one again, even if applicants Let's say they used a choice first
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Haveli Lakha lawyer