Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD HASSAN

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 526 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/342/220/148/149 after transferring the record of evidence to the state and recording the evidence in the case of a counter direct complaint. Was. The state's case was first to dismiss the accused and direct complaint filed against the accused (applicants), whose extra-judicial proceedings were allegedly highly biased and relied on by the Additional Sessions Judge. The state issue and the private complaint was created. In that case, the Additional Sessions Judge was obliged under the law to process and adjudicate the complaint first and thereafter, to ensure the clarification of the state of the case presented by the Additional Sessions Judge in his remarks. , The direct complaint was withdrawn. The High Court moved the aforementioned Additional Sessions Judge to court and the same to the Sessions Judge's file for disposals. The year according to the law immigration advocates from Bisham lawyer