ABDUL LATIF AASSI versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 409/468/480/471 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Sections 540 and 439 of the trial court have the power to Ask about the evidence left. After the prosecution's trial court heard the final arguments on the merits of the trial, the orders that were set for the directive were directed to send the two exhibited documents to the handwriting expert for a prescription, along with other filed documents. Should also be reported and the matter adjourned for further hearing. During the trial of this trial, the trial court also included allegations of corruption by any civil servant. The most important witnesses who could directly testify on behalf of the accused were their statements before the Investigation Officer, and other prosecution witnesses were reluctant to commit the crime. He was never bothered by the investigating officer to obtain the signatures of the accused on the alleged receipt issued by his handwriting expert and the prosecutor's lawyer also referred to the signatures trial. Failure to apply to the trial court for competition, therefore, an invalid order was properly passed before the final judgment to ensure the guilt or innocence of the accused under which a review request was made. Was deleted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Wah Cantt lawyer