MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus THE STATE
Criminal Code (CR PC) Section 417 Appeals against wrongful interference by the Supreme Rule will not interfere with the acquittal simply because the decision on the restoration of evidence is to acquit an accused, provided both conclusions can be drawn. If possible, however, it was concluded at the conclusion of this court that no reasonable person could overcome it and that it was impossible, that the court would intervene in extraordinary matters on heavy evidence, resulting in final and There can be irrational conclusions. And that too, just to avoid serious abortion of justice and for any other purpose with the view that the important test considered in these cases is that after the investigation under the light of inquiry, which is to be interfered with Yes, it should be found to be completely artificial, startling. And the ridiculous high court interferes with the verdict on the overwhelming evidence that can lead to conclusive and unambiguous conclusions, the court below concludes that a reasonable person was Can't reach the point. And that too with a view to avoiding serious abortion
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Naukot lawyer