Find a Lawyer

S.M. GHARIB NAWAZ DACCAWALA versus SINDH BAR COUNCIL

Articles 22, 34 and 62 of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 ??? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 ??? Constitutional petition ??? Register as a Supreme Court Lawyer ??? The obligation to contribute to a charitable fund? ? The petitioner, a Supreme Court lawyer, supported the demand for a contribution to the welfare fund set up by the Provincial Bar Council, and claimed that after his enrollment as a Supreme Court advocate, Were denied the obligation to pay the contribution. Regarding your registration as an Advocate Supreme Court on the role of advocate in the Pakistan Bar Council, should the respondent provincial bar consul remove his name from his register and correct his role? correction? The applicant, who was participating in the annual fee fixed by Pakistan. The bar council regularly pays to the provincial bar council, unable to claim that it is not responsible for contributing to the benefit fund established by the provincial bar council. Advocate advocates for the welfare of their lawyers, especially when the applicant was fully utilizing the rights and privileges of the Admissions Advocate under the Provincial Bar Council? By applicant, but is it the provincial bar council's governing body? ??? The Pakistan Bar Council was not exclusively affiliated with the Supreme Court Advocates and as such, no lawyer will cease to have any connection with any Provincial Bar Council. ??? The Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 did not present that on the registration of the Supreme Court as a lawyer, a person's name was the Provincial Bar Council best law firms from Pindi bhohri lawyer