Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus SALIM ZIA

Sections 55 (1) (a) (b) and 68 (2) (a) representing the People's Act 1976, evidence of illegal and corrupt evidence petition filed several allegations against the returning candidate and these allegations Corruption can be appreciated. And illegal proceedings but did not find evidence of how and when the returning candidate and / or his agents made such an impactful commission, based on such sketchy, scarce and weak evidence. Played a role, it will be difficult. Temporarily the applicant could not give full details of the illegality or corruption of the returning candidate and thus the withdrawal from the entire constituency, nor could any allegation be made by the applicant. Was able to prove that the same was done with the consent of the returning candidate and the accused. Neither his election agent, nor any material available on record could have granted the applicant any relief, or on the basis of which the candidate who had lost the election could be declared invalid. had gone immigration advocates email from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer