ASHRAF versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497 and 498 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (ii) and 34 before arrest arrest, in particular, the confirmation of the injuries of the complainant and the prosecution witness. Two of the suspects were named, while the third one was named Jepha and Fist. The accused persons were yet to be included in the investigation of the case, who applied for bail before the confirmation, failed to appear in court, their application was dismissed for non-prosecution. When it was said that the request was set for a final hearing. , The accused persons deliberately refused to appear in court and, although they remained outside the court and viewed by the complainant, they despised the behavior and behavior of the accused and they secretly disobeyed the court and the law. Had committed a joke. Through the law and the court and such conduct, the privileges of the guarantees granted to them were misused. Will not be encouraged, but in order to maintain the dignity of the court and to prevent the use of the law prima facie, such undesirable behavior had to be stopped and dealt with by hand, confirming bail before the accused's arrest. There was no valid basis for pre-arrest validity denied bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Nooriabad lawyer