Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD PARVEZ versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Article 4 Constitution of Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974 Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Maintaining the correctness of the demonetization Constitutional petition The public servant who was demolished by the order of the competent authority has been appointed by the Senior Superintendent of Police to the Deputy Inspector General of Police. Challenged his mitigation in front of Appeal was filed by a public servant by the police, the appeal of the public servant was stopped, both illegally and illegally, and it was not sent to the Deputy Inspector General of Police who was the appellate authority and Legal appeal was signed to record a public servant challenged in his constitutional application The constitutional request of the senior superintendent of police filed by government employees was resisted on the grounds that he was not eligible because a public servant Who has the right to appeal and. Subsequently, a reviewer, who can file an appeal before the Senior Tribunal of the Service Tribunal, who was not an appellate authority, cannot decide whether the deputy inspector general should approach the police on behalf of a public servant. Whether or not an appeal is authorized, the senior superintendent of police, through whom the appeal was filed by a public servant, was under legal duty to forward the appeal to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, who had a demand for a public employee's appeal. High court accepts constitutional plea with costs: Senior superintendent police Appeal Re-employee director to send a deputy inspector. General police before a certain date law firms from Manga Mandi lawyer