MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code section 302 praised the evidence that the complainant, who was the father of the original accused, was acquitted against the accused on oath and there was no reason to deny such star witness Ocular Account Medical Evidence and Chemical Examiner's report. Confirmed the recovery of bloody weapons from the crime of. It was the serologist's affirmative defense of the weapon recovered from the suspect, which was considered by the accused to be extremely unnatural and illogical, the defendant's act was so disappointing and offensive that it had real The father also did not hesitate to make a statement against him and he fully supported the trial case. There was no reduction in favor of the accused, conviction or punishment under the trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Sudhnoti lawyer
