ALLAH WARAYO CHANA versus AIJAZ AHMAD KHAN
Section 8 and 24 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act 1973 (Civil Prohibition, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, R10 seniority promotion of civil servants was given on an ad hoc basis but with them the department was appointed as a regular appointment. Was governed and ruled. According to the rules in which no arrangements were made for ad hoc appointments, the seniority of such public servants should be calculated from the date of their continued liability against their subsequent principles if the government regulates such services. Failed to issue regular order in relation to create. Contrary to the Government-issued notification under Section 24, Sindh Civil Servants Act 1973, regarding the seniority of public servants, after the service tribunal's decision on the sanity of public servants. , Looks more than the ignorant than the ignorant. Already stood regularly and the question of whether to give effect to the notification was not relevant. Such public servants were left at a junior position against the co-operative public servants; this would be against all principles of justice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Bagh lawyer