FAIZ MUHAMMAD versus A. RAUF
The accused was specially summoned in connection with the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/109 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Articles 265 K & 417 (2), which stated that he had been violated. There was plenty of material available to take action, but in this case, using the jurisdiction under 5 265 K during further proceedings, CCPC invalidated and rejected his previous order and passed the order for his fate. What, at the same time, the trial court could not approve and reproduce, resulted in the impugning order of the accused's success. , Set aside the trial court's direction to proceed to trial against the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Makli lawyer
