Find a Lawyer

SYED CATERERS versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Para 1125 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition Challenges bid invitations to approve contract for railway dining carriers and railway station restaurants, etc. Railway invites bid for approval of this agreement Did the railway have a license? The sales and catering system, however, was abolished and instead the job was handed over to a committee that resulted in merit reduction, political considerations, unfair, unfair and discriminatory treatment. The rule of the powerful and the wealthy was that the railway was a system of invitation. In Bid, it was adopted to maintain the quality and quality of food delivery to passengers, before it was promised in the Supreme Court. That future contracts will be granted through an open auction, with the Supreme Court inviting bids through the system. Was accepted. The Railways was not only in violation of the directions of the Supreme Court nor the given responsibility, but also against the controversial decisions / proceedings inviting sealed bids in connection with the Railway's controversial decision / catering and vendor agreements, Illegal, arbitrary and without any legal effect it was found that the contract should be awarded through open auction. us immigration advocates from Shankiari lawyer