Find a Lawyer

JAVED IQBAL versus MST. MARYAM

Article 5, Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for Dover and Recovery Allowance The suit acknowledges that the wife waived her doorstep through a consent suit, as well as a tenure of ten (10) to gold. It was appointed that only a minor witness of the agreement was not presented to the court and at the time of the execution of the agreement, his witnesses were contradictory and no one was present on the wife at the time of the execution of the agreement. The following two courts did not comply (agreement) as per the law, the issue of rehabilitation was rightly decided by the lower courts in view of the financial status of the husband. No legal or irregularities were committed. Dismissed in circumstances

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• SAEED-UR-REHMAN v. CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, through Director General Intelligence, Islamabad 2015 CLC 834
• AZMAT ULLAH alias DADDI v. PIR BADSHAH 2015 PCrLJ 838
• MUZAMMIL HUSSAIN v. State 2015 PTD 851
• Syed ISHAQ SHAH v. SHAKIR SHAH 2015 PCrLJ 860
• AKHTAR ALI KHAN v. DILAWAR KHAN 2015 CLC 872
• FAHID ULLAH KHAN v. Mst. DIL PAZIR JAN 2015 PCrLJ 873
• Mst. Dr. SABINA IMRAN v. Mst. ZUBAIDA BEGUM 2015 YLR 887
• SIBTAIN ALI SHAH v. State 2015 PCrLJ 890

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

best advocate from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes