Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Law In The Testimony (1079 1984), Article 46 Testimonial Testimony Of Death Declaration Acceptance Of the three eye witnesses, two invasive witnesses were withheld by the prosecution, and the only one presented by the prosecution during the trial. The witness, who was the son of a witness, said the prosecution did not disclose the presence of eyewitnesses on the scene, adding that the witness's statement was improved when the time of the incident was an hour before sunrise when police in the dark. The checkpoint had fallen to the site of the incident and on the way to the hospital but no report was filed there. It was barely 3/4 km away and the goods were readily available but the deceased was taken within an hour which was a waste of time. The incident was unknown and a report was filed after consultation. While the deceased was conscious due to excessive blood loss, his condition was still in serious shock. The deceased's relatives were present and relatives of the deceased had been identified by such relatives. According to the statement, the method of recovering the wounds on the body of the deceased was completely ignored by medical evidence. The person's reason for his death was admissible in evidence but could not be attributed to the Holiness associated with it as a deceased declaration where this statement was not proven to be correct and the physical / scientific phenomena recorded on record As opposed to And the truth could not be found on the lips of the deceased, as well as the prosecution of the sanctification of the deceased's statement given before the police disclosed his death. how to become a advocate from Madinah lawyer