Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PAPOO versus STATE


SS 302, 324, 307, 395, 396, 397 and 398 Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 4 Sindh Children Act (XIV of 1955), Section 10 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) ), Section 57 Special Court, the jurisdiction of the two accused at the time of the incident was less than 16 years. All the accused, including the persons under trial in the Special Age Court, were tried and were similarly convicted and A valid trial was held for the accused under the age of 16. As was supposed to be done separately under section 10, the Sindh Children Act 1955, such illegal section was not curable under Section 3737, CRPC and it also adversely affected the entire Trial State Council. At the same time, the complainant's counsel had no objection to any new trial. In the circumstances the first remand for trial was obtained

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Kamokey lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.