Find a Lawyer

GULLAN versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 testimony of testimony was triggered only by the complainant who was the father of the accused and was not confirmed by any other witness, because under the very precaution, the trial court rightly rejected it. It was concluded that its purpose could not be proved. Any reasonable suspicion against the accused, but this aspect of the case will not justify the whole story of the prosecutor, who otherwise stands on strong conclusions, other than the complainant who is the victim's father, another respected and independent in the area. The person supported the story in connection with the extra-judicial confession. The accused and the complainant before him said that the respected and independent person was the chairman, the association was e-Dokhandran and not only an unwanted witness, but also a credible person in this case, the body of the deceased girl will be considered by the accused. Exported from home. The woman filed a lawsuit in front of the complainant and the prosecutor's witness complainant, which was a strong motive for her extra-judicial confession, although she was the deceased's father, but it was not likely that she was the wrongful accused. Instead of being the real culprit and involved in the crime, the medical evidence also supported the version given in the extra-judicial confession of the accused and showed the story. Extra judicial confession revealed in the offense, not only was it possible, but the true prosecution had, in the circumstances, proved beyond any reasonable doubt against the accused in the murder of the aggravating motive in the event of an effective murder and The reality of murder is shroud. Mystery, in such a situation, the trial court hear the accused sentenced to life imprisonment famous high court advocate from Sakrand lawyer